Complaints & Recalls
Official Safety Recalls - Important!
4 RecallsThese are official manufacturer recalls ordered by NHTSA for safety defects. If you own this vehicle, contact your dealer immediately for free repairs.
General Motors, Llc
Safety Issue:
General Motors, LLC (GM) is recalling certain 2014-2017 Buick Enclave, Chevrolet Traverse, and GMC Acadia vehicles. The driver's air bag inflator may explode during deployment, due to a manufacturing defect.
Potential Risk:
FREE Recall Solution:
Additional Details:
Owners may also contact the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Vehicle Safety Hotline at 1-888-327-4236 (TTY 1-800-424-9153), or go to www.nhtsa.gov.
Mfg Campaign: N232404980
Recall Date: May 10, 2023
General Motors Llc
Safety Issue:
General Motors LLC (GM) is recalling certain 2015-2018 GMC Canyon, 2016-2017 Buick Envision, 2016-2018 Chevrolet Colorado and Malibu, 2017-2018 GMC Acadia, 2018 Buick LaCrosse, Cadillac ATS, Chevrolet Equinox, and GMC Terrain vehicles. The high pressure fuel pump may detach from its mounting flange, possibly resulting in the pump damaging the high pressure fuel line.
Potential Risk:
FREE Recall Solution:
Additional Details:
Owners may also contact the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Vehicle Safety Hotline at 1-888-327-4236 (TTY 1-800-424-9153), or go to www.safercar.gov.
Mfg Campaign: 18188 18268
Recall Date: May 31, 2018
General Motors Llc
Safety Issue:
General Motors LLC (GM) is recalling certain 2018 Chevrolet Equinox and GMC Terrain vehicles and 2017-2018 GMC Acadia vehicles. The right front intermediate driveshaft may fracture and separate while driving.
Potential Risk:
FREE Recall Solution:
Additional Details:
Owners may also contact the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Vehicle Safety Hotline at 1-888-327-4236 (TTY 1-800-424-9153), or go to www.safercar.gov.
Mfg Campaign: 17329
Recall Date: Aug 22, 2017
General Motors Llc
Safety Issue:
General Motors LLC (GM) is recalling certain model year 2017 Cadillac XT5 vehicles manufactured April 16, 2016, to May 9, 2016, and 2017 GMC Acadia vehicles manufactured April 19, 2016, to April 22, 2016. The front brake calipers may have a torn or misaligned caliper piston seal which may allow brake fluid to leak.
Potential Risk:
FREE Recall Solution:
Additional Details:
Owners may also contact the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Vehicle Safety Hotline at 1-888-327-4236 (TTY 1-800-424-9153), or go to www.safercar.gov.
Mfg Campaign: 16096
Recall Date: Nov 4, 2016
Consumer Complaints
860 ComplaintsGeneral Motors, Llc
Defect Description:
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
Potential Consequences:
2017 GMC ACADIAS EQUIPPED WITH HID HEADLAMPS WITH LOW BEAMS ACTIVATED ARE BLINDING TO ONCOMING DRIVERS.
Corrective Action:
2017 GMC ACADIAS EQUIPPED WITH HID HEADLAMPS WITH LOW BEAMS ACTIVATED ARE BLINDING TO ONCOMING DRIVERS.
Additional Notes:
2017 GMC ACADIAS EQUIPPED WITH HID HEADLAMPS WITH LOW BEAMS ACTIVATED ARE BLINDING TO ONCOMING DRIVERS.
Mfg Campaign: 10994640
Recall Date: Jun 13, 2017
General Motors, Llc
Defect Description:
POWER TRAIN
Potential Consequences:
MY 2017 GMC ACADIS 6 CYLINDER AWD HAS EXCESSIVE VIBRATIONS THAT OCCUR AT 1400-1600 RPM AND AT VARIOUS SPEEDS.IT SEEMS LIKE THE TRANSMISSION REFUSES TO SHIFT AND IT LASTS FOR UP TO A QUARTER MILE.VIBRATION IS MOST PRONOUNCED AT SPEEDS OF 55-60 MPH THE DEALER DIAGNOSIS SAYS IT IS FUNCTIONING NORMAL. THE STRUTS WERE REPLACE AT1390 MILES AND MOTOR MOUNTS ADJUSTED, PROBLEM REMAINS, AUTO BROUGHT TO DEALER FOR RECALL AS PER BULLETIN 17109 BUT IT STILL VIBRATES EXCESSIVELY. THE LEAD MECHANIC AT THE DEALERSHIP SAID THE AUTO ADJUSTS TO THE DRIVER AND SAID THE VIBRATIONS WILL STOP AT ABOUT 2500 MILES. THE CAR NOW HAS 2900 MILES AND IT STILL FEELS LIKE THE TRANSMISSION IS GOING TO FAIL. THE VIBRATION IS UNCOMFORTABLE AND ALTHOUGH THE DEALERSHIP SAID THE CAR IS SAFE IT DOES NOT FEEL SO.IT SEEMS IMPOSSIBLE FOR A VEHICLE TO BE FUNCTIONING PROPERLY WITH THIS CONTINUAL ERRATIC VIBRATIONS.
Corrective Action:
MY 2017 GMC ACADIS 6 CYLINDER AWD HAS EXCESSIVE VIBRATIONS THAT OCCUR AT 1400-1600 RPM AND AT VARIOUS SPEEDS.IT SEEMS LIKE THE TRANSMISSION REFUSES TO SHIFT AND IT LASTS FOR UP TO A QUARTER MILE.VIBRATION IS MOST PRONOUNCED AT SPEEDS OF 55-60 MPH THE DEALER DIAGNOSIS SAYS IT IS FUNCTIONING NORMAL. THE STRUTS WERE REPLACE AT1390 MILES AND MOTOR MOUNTS ADJUSTED, PROBLEM REMAINS, AUTO BROUGHT TO DEALER FOR RECALL AS PER BULLETIN 17109 BUT IT STILL VIBRATES EXCESSIVELY. THE LEAD MECHANIC AT THE DEALERSHIP SAID THE AUTO ADJUSTS TO THE DRIVER AND SAID THE VIBRATIONS WILL STOP AT ABOUT 2500 MILES. THE CAR NOW HAS 2900 MILES AND IT STILL FEELS LIKE THE TRANSMISSION IS GOING TO FAIL. THE VIBRATION IS UNCOMFORTABLE AND ALTHOUGH THE DEALERSHIP SAID THE CAR IS SAFE IT DOES NOT FEEL SO.IT SEEMS IMPOSSIBLE FOR A VEHICLE TO BE FUNCTIONING PROPERLY WITH THIS CONTINUAL ERRATIC VIBRATIONS.
Additional Notes:
MY 2017 GMC ACADIS 6 CYLINDER AWD HAS EXCESSIVE VIBRATIONS THAT OCCUR AT 1400-1600 RPM AND AT VARIOUS SPEEDS.IT SEEMS LIKE THE TRANSMISSION REFUSES TO SHIFT AND IT LASTS FOR UP TO A QUARTER MILE.VIBRATION IS MOST PRONOUNCED AT SPEEDS OF 55-60 MPH THE DEALER DIAGNOSIS SAYS IT IS FUNCTIONING NORMAL. THE STRUTS WERE REPLACE AT1390 MILES AND MOTOR MOUNTS ADJUSTED, PROBLEM REMAINS, AUTO BROUGHT TO DEALER FOR RECALL AS PER BULLETIN 17109 BUT IT STILL VIBRATES EXCESSIVELY. THE LEAD MECHANIC AT THE DEALERSHIP SAID THE AUTO ADJUSTS TO THE DRIVER AND SAID THE VIBRATIONS WILL STOP AT ABOUT 2500 MILES. THE CAR NOW HAS 2900 MILES AND IT STILL FEELS LIKE THE TRANSMISSION IS GOING TO FAIL. THE VIBRATION IS UNCOMFORTABLE AND ALTHOUGH THE DEALERSHIP SAID THE CAR IS SAFE IT DOES NOT FEEL SO.IT SEEMS IMPOSSIBLE FOR A VEHICLE TO BE FUNCTIONING PROPERLY WITH THIS CONTINUAL ERRATIC VIBRATIONS.
Mfg Campaign: 10985497
Recall Date: May 13, 2017
General Motors, Llc
Defect Description:
SUSPENSION
Potential Consequences:
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2017 GMC ACADIA. WHILE DRIVING VARIOUS SPEEDS, THE TRANSMISSION HESITATED TO SHIFT GEARS AND THE VEHICLE BEGAN TO VIBRATE EXCESSIVELY. THERE WERE NO WARNING INDICATORS ILLUMINATED. THE CONTACT REFERENCED GMC RECALL NUMBER 17109 (REAR DIFFERENTIAL CLUTCH CONTROL MODULE). THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A DEALER WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED THAT THE STRUTS AND THE MOTOR MOUNT NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. ADDITIONALLY, FIELD TESTERS DETERMINED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS OPERATING NORMALLY. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED, BUT THE FAILURE RECURRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE, BUT DID NOT ASSIST. THE MANUFACTURER STATED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS OPERABLE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 209,000.
Corrective Action:
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2017 GMC ACADIA. WHILE DRIVING VARIOUS SPEEDS, THE TRANSMISSION HESITATED TO SHIFT GEARS AND THE VEHICLE BEGAN TO VIBRATE EXCESSIVELY. THERE WERE NO WARNING INDICATORS ILLUMINATED. THE CONTACT REFERENCED GMC RECALL NUMBER 17109 (REAR DIFFERENTIAL CLUTCH CONTROL MODULE). THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A DEALER WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED THAT THE STRUTS AND THE MOTOR MOUNT NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. ADDITIONALLY, FIELD TESTERS DETERMINED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS OPERATING NORMALLY. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED, BUT THE FAILURE RECURRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE, BUT DID NOT ASSIST. THE MANUFACTURER STATED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS OPERABLE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 209,000.
Additional Notes:
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2017 GMC ACADIA. WHILE DRIVING VARIOUS SPEEDS, THE TRANSMISSION HESITATED TO SHIFT GEARS AND THE VEHICLE BEGAN TO VIBRATE EXCESSIVELY. THERE WERE NO WARNING INDICATORS ILLUMINATED. THE CONTACT REFERENCED GMC RECALL NUMBER 17109 (REAR DIFFERENTIAL CLUTCH CONTROL MODULE). THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A DEALER WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED THAT THE STRUTS AND THE MOTOR MOUNT NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. ADDITIONALLY, FIELD TESTERS DETERMINED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS OPERATING NORMALLY. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED, BUT THE FAILURE RECURRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE, BUT DID NOT ASSIST. THE MANUFACTURER STATED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS OPERABLE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 209,000.
Mfg Campaign: 10984251
Recall Date: May 8, 2017
General Motors, Llc
Defect Description:
POWER TRAIN
Potential Consequences:
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2017 GMC ACADIA. WHILE DRIVING VARIOUS SPEEDS, THE TRANSMISSION HESITATED TO SHIFT GEARS AND THE VEHICLE BEGAN TO VIBRATE EXCESSIVELY. THERE WERE NO WARNING INDICATORS ILLUMINATED. THE CONTACT REFERENCED GMC RECALL NUMBER 17109 (REAR DIFFERENTIAL CLUTCH CONTROL MODULE). THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A DEALER WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED THAT THE STRUTS AND THE MOTOR MOUNT NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. ADDITIONALLY, FIELD TESTERS DETERMINED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS OPERATING NORMALLY. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED, BUT THE FAILURE RECURRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE, BUT DID NOT ASSIST. THE MANUFACTURER STATED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS OPERABLE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 209,000.
Corrective Action:
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2017 GMC ACADIA. WHILE DRIVING VARIOUS SPEEDS, THE TRANSMISSION HESITATED TO SHIFT GEARS AND THE VEHICLE BEGAN TO VIBRATE EXCESSIVELY. THERE WERE NO WARNING INDICATORS ILLUMINATED. THE CONTACT REFERENCED GMC RECALL NUMBER 17109 (REAR DIFFERENTIAL CLUTCH CONTROL MODULE). THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A DEALER WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED THAT THE STRUTS AND THE MOTOR MOUNT NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. ADDITIONALLY, FIELD TESTERS DETERMINED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS OPERATING NORMALLY. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED, BUT THE FAILURE RECURRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE, BUT DID NOT ASSIST. THE MANUFACTURER STATED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS OPERABLE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 209,000.
Additional Notes:
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2017 GMC ACADIA. WHILE DRIVING VARIOUS SPEEDS, THE TRANSMISSION HESITATED TO SHIFT GEARS AND THE VEHICLE BEGAN TO VIBRATE EXCESSIVELY. THERE WERE NO WARNING INDICATORS ILLUMINATED. THE CONTACT REFERENCED GMC RECALL NUMBER 17109 (REAR DIFFERENTIAL CLUTCH CONTROL MODULE). THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A DEALER WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED THAT THE STRUTS AND THE MOTOR MOUNT NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. ADDITIONALLY, FIELD TESTERS DETERMINED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS OPERATING NORMALLY. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED, BUT THE FAILURE RECURRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE, BUT DID NOT ASSIST. THE MANUFACTURER STATED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS OPERABLE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 209,000.
Mfg Campaign: 10984251
Recall Date: May 8, 2017
General Motors, Llc
Defect Description:
STEERING
Potential Consequences:
THE STEERING HAS LOCKED BRIEFLY 3 TIMES WHILE DRIVING ON THE FREEWAY WITHIN THE LAST FEW WEEKS. THE FIRST TIME I WAS CHANGING LANES ON I-8 GOING ABOUT 45 MPH. THE NEXT TIME I WAS TAKING A FREEWAY EXIT RAMP FROM I-805 TO THE I-8 DECELERATING AND HAD NO CONTROL AS I TURNED THE WHEEL TO MANEUVER THROUGH THE CURVE. THIS PAST SATURDAY, 4/8, I WAS EXITING I-805 AT SORRENTO VALLEY ROAD AND THE STEERING LOCKED FOR OVER 2 SECONDS. I ORIGINALLY THOUGHT THIS WAS A SUSPENSION ISSUE. HOWEVER, I FINALLY RECEIVED SERVICE RECORDS FROM HOEHN GMC IN CARLSBAD ON 4/7 THAT STATED THERE WAS AN ISSUE WITH THE VEHICLE BEFORE I TOOK DELIVERY. THE SERVICE RECORD STATES '40 DTC P16E5 SENSOR COMM CIRCUIT 3 HIGN VOLTAGE' AND A PART WAS REPLACED. HOWEVER, I PICKED UP THE VEHICLE ON 3/2 AND THE SERVICE INVOICE HAS A DATE OF 3/22. I HAVE NOT BEEN BACK TO THE DEALER SINCE 3/2. I HAD TO LEAVE THE VEHICLE AT THE DEALER ON 2/28 WHEN I SIGNED THE LEASE AGREEMENT BECAUSE THE DEALERSHIP TOLD ME THE TRANSMISSION WAS STILL LOCKED. WHEN I PICKED UP MY VEHICLE ON 3/2, I NOTICED THE VEHICLE HAD 34 ADDITIONAL MILES SINCE MY INITIAL INSPECTION ON 2/28. AFTER SEVERAL UNANSWERED EMAILS AND PHONE CALLS TO JERRY BRUMMET OVER THE LAST MONTH, HE FINALLY SENT ME THE SERVICE RECORDS TO SHOW THE REASON FOR THE ADDITIONAL MILEAGE. THIS SURPRISED ME BECAUSE I WAS NEVER NOTIFIED OF AN ISSUE WHEN I PICKED UP THE VEHICLE, NOR DID I RECEIVE ANY SERVICE RECORDS. I DO NOT FEEL SAFE DRIVING THIS VEHICLE AND WOULD HAVE TAKEN IT IN FOR SERVICE SOONER HAD THE DEALERSHIP NOTIFIED AND PROVIDED THE SERVICE RECORDS INDICATING THERE WERE FACTORY DEFECTS PRIOR TO MY RECEIVING IT. I PLAN TO TAKE THE VEHICLE TO ANOTHER DEALERSHIP FOR SERVICE IN THE MEANTIME. ULTIMATELY, I AM CONCERNED THIS IS A REPEAT SAFETY PROBLEM THAT MAY LEAD TO AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER BODILY INJURY.
Corrective Action:
THE STEERING HAS LOCKED BRIEFLY 3 TIMES WHILE DRIVING ON THE FREEWAY WITHIN THE LAST FEW WEEKS. THE FIRST TIME I WAS CHANGING LANES ON I-8 GOING ABOUT 45 MPH. THE NEXT TIME I WAS TAKING A FREEWAY EXIT RAMP FROM I-805 TO THE I-8 DECELERATING AND HAD NO CONTROL AS I TURNED THE WHEEL TO MANEUVER THROUGH THE CURVE. THIS PAST SATURDAY, 4/8, I WAS EXITING I-805 AT SORRENTO VALLEY ROAD AND THE STEERING LOCKED FOR OVER 2 SECONDS. I ORIGINALLY THOUGHT THIS WAS A SUSPENSION ISSUE. HOWEVER, I FINALLY RECEIVED SERVICE RECORDS FROM HOEHN GMC IN CARLSBAD ON 4/7 THAT STATED THERE WAS AN ISSUE WITH THE VEHICLE BEFORE I TOOK DELIVERY. THE SERVICE RECORD STATES '40 DTC P16E5 SENSOR COMM CIRCUIT 3 HIGN VOLTAGE' AND A PART WAS REPLACED. HOWEVER, I PICKED UP THE VEHICLE ON 3/2 AND THE SERVICE INVOICE HAS A DATE OF 3/22. I HAVE NOT BEEN BACK TO THE DEALER SINCE 3/2. I HAD TO LEAVE THE VEHICLE AT THE DEALER ON 2/28 WHEN I SIGNED THE LEASE AGREEMENT BECAUSE THE DEALERSHIP TOLD ME THE TRANSMISSION WAS STILL LOCKED. WHEN I PICKED UP MY VEHICLE ON 3/2, I NOTICED THE VEHICLE HAD 34 ADDITIONAL MILES SINCE MY INITIAL INSPECTION ON 2/28. AFTER SEVERAL UNANSWERED EMAILS AND PHONE CALLS TO JERRY BRUMMET OVER THE LAST MONTH, HE FINALLY SENT ME THE SERVICE RECORDS TO SHOW THE REASON FOR THE ADDITIONAL MILEAGE. THIS SURPRISED ME BECAUSE I WAS NEVER NOTIFIED OF AN ISSUE WHEN I PICKED UP THE VEHICLE, NOR DID I RECEIVE ANY SERVICE RECORDS. I DO NOT FEEL SAFE DRIVING THIS VEHICLE AND WOULD HAVE TAKEN IT IN FOR SERVICE SOONER HAD THE DEALERSHIP NOTIFIED AND PROVIDED THE SERVICE RECORDS INDICATING THERE WERE FACTORY DEFECTS PRIOR TO MY RECEIVING IT. I PLAN TO TAKE THE VEHICLE TO ANOTHER DEALERSHIP FOR SERVICE IN THE MEANTIME. ULTIMATELY, I AM CONCERNED THIS IS A REPEAT SAFETY PROBLEM THAT MAY LEAD TO AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER BODILY INJURY.
Additional Notes:
THE STEERING HAS LOCKED BRIEFLY 3 TIMES WHILE DRIVING ON THE FREEWAY WITHIN THE LAST FEW WEEKS. THE FIRST TIME I WAS CHANGING LANES ON I-8 GOING ABOUT 45 MPH. THE NEXT TIME I WAS TAKING A FREEWAY EXIT RAMP FROM I-805 TO THE I-8 DECELERATING AND HAD NO CONTROL AS I TURNED THE WHEEL TO MANEUVER THROUGH THE CURVE. THIS PAST SATURDAY, 4/8, I WAS EXITING I-805 AT SORRENTO VALLEY ROAD AND THE STEERING LOCKED FOR OVER 2 SECONDS. I ORIGINALLY THOUGHT THIS WAS A SUSPENSION ISSUE. HOWEVER, I FINALLY RECEIVED SERVICE RECORDS FROM HOEHN GMC IN CARLSBAD ON 4/7 THAT STATED THERE WAS AN ISSUE WITH THE VEHICLE BEFORE I TOOK DELIVERY. THE SERVICE RECORD STATES '40 DTC P16E5 SENSOR COMM CIRCUIT 3 HIGN VOLTAGE' AND A PART WAS REPLACED. HOWEVER, I PICKED UP THE VEHICLE ON 3/2 AND THE SERVICE INVOICE HAS A DATE OF 3/22. I HAVE NOT BEEN BACK TO THE DEALER SINCE 3/2. I HAD TO LEAVE THE VEHICLE AT THE DEALER ON 2/28 WHEN I SIGNED THE LEASE AGREEMENT BECAUSE THE DEALERSHIP TOLD ME THE TRANSMISSION WAS STILL LOCKED. WHEN I PICKED UP MY VEHICLE ON 3/2, I NOTICED THE VEHICLE HAD 34 ADDITIONAL MILES SINCE MY INITIAL INSPECTION ON 2/28. AFTER SEVERAL UNANSWERED EMAILS AND PHONE CALLS TO JERRY BRUMMET OVER THE LAST MONTH, HE FINALLY SENT ME THE SERVICE RECORDS TO SHOW THE REASON FOR THE ADDITIONAL MILEAGE. THIS SURPRISED ME BECAUSE I WAS NEVER NOTIFIED OF AN ISSUE WHEN I PICKED UP THE VEHICLE, NOR DID I RECEIVE ANY SERVICE RECORDS. I DO NOT FEEL SAFE DRIVING THIS VEHICLE AND WOULD HAVE TAKEN IT IN FOR SERVICE SOONER HAD THE DEALERSHIP NOTIFIED AND PROVIDED THE SERVICE RECORDS INDICATING THERE WERE FACTORY DEFECTS PRIOR TO MY RECEIVING IT. I PLAN TO TAKE THE VEHICLE TO ANOTHER DEALERSHIP FOR SERVICE IN THE MEANTIME. ULTIMATELY, I AM CONCERNED THIS IS A REPEAT SAFETY PROBLEM THAT MAY LEAD TO AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER BODILY INJURY.
Mfg Campaign: 10971547
Recall Date: Apr 10, 2017
General Motors, Llc
Defect Description:
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
Potential Consequences:
HORN WILL NOT HONK UNLESS EXCESSIVE PRESSURE IS APPLIED. IT TAKES 2 HANDS TO HONK THE HORN. I HAVE NEVER SEEN A HORN THAT REQUIRED MORE THAN 1 FINGER TO HONK.
Corrective Action:
HORN WILL NOT HONK UNLESS EXCESSIVE PRESSURE IS APPLIED. IT TAKES 2 HANDS TO HONK THE HORN. I HAVE NEVER SEEN A HORN THAT REQUIRED MORE THAN 1 FINGER TO HONK.
Additional Notes:
HORN WILL NOT HONK UNLESS EXCESSIVE PRESSURE IS APPLIED. IT TAKES 2 HANDS TO HONK THE HORN. I HAVE NEVER SEEN A HORN THAT REQUIRED MORE THAN 1 FINGER TO HONK.
Mfg Campaign: 10971062
Recall Date: Apr 7, 2017
General Motors, Llc
Defect Description:
UNKNOWN OR OTHER
Potential Consequences:
POWER LIFTGATE MALFUNCTION- LIFTGATE WAS OPERATED FROM THE REAR SWITCH. UPON ACTIVATION IT ROSE ALMOST FULLY AND THEN SLAMMED DOWN ON A PERSON WHILE THEY WERE ACCESSING THE REAR CARGO AREA, INJURING THEIR NOSE AND FACE. LIFTGATE FAILED TO STOP AT OBSTRUCTION. FROM THAT POINT ON LIFTGATE FAILED TO OPEN OR CLOSE WITHOUT MANUAL INTERVENTION. VEHICLE WAS STATIONARY, ENGINE RUNNING AND MOSTLY LEVEL STREET. WEATHER HAD BEEN RAINY BUT WAS NOT RAINING AT THE TIME, 63 DEGREE TEMP. NOT SURE IF IT WAS IN PARK OR DRIVE, BUT BRAKES WERE APPLIED AND OTHER PASSENGERS WERE ENTERING THE VEHICLE. THE NEXT MORNING THE POWER LIFTGATE HAS OPERATED NORMALLY.
Corrective Action:
POWER LIFTGATE MALFUNCTION- LIFTGATE WAS OPERATED FROM THE REAR SWITCH. UPON ACTIVATION IT ROSE ALMOST FULLY AND THEN SLAMMED DOWN ON A PERSON WHILE THEY WERE ACCESSING THE REAR CARGO AREA, INJURING THEIR NOSE AND FACE. LIFTGATE FAILED TO STOP AT OBSTRUCTION. FROM THAT POINT ON LIFTGATE FAILED TO OPEN OR CLOSE WITHOUT MANUAL INTERVENTION. VEHICLE WAS STATIONARY, ENGINE RUNNING AND MOSTLY LEVEL STREET. WEATHER HAD BEEN RAINY BUT WAS NOT RAINING AT THE TIME, 63 DEGREE TEMP. NOT SURE IF IT WAS IN PARK OR DRIVE, BUT BRAKES WERE APPLIED AND OTHER PASSENGERS WERE ENTERING THE VEHICLE. THE NEXT MORNING THE POWER LIFTGATE HAS OPERATED NORMALLY.
Additional Notes:
POWER LIFTGATE MALFUNCTION- LIFTGATE WAS OPERATED FROM THE REAR SWITCH. UPON ACTIVATION IT ROSE ALMOST FULLY AND THEN SLAMMED DOWN ON A PERSON WHILE THEY WERE ACCESSING THE REAR CARGO AREA, INJURING THEIR NOSE AND FACE. LIFTGATE FAILED TO STOP AT OBSTRUCTION. FROM THAT POINT ON LIFTGATE FAILED TO OPEN OR CLOSE WITHOUT MANUAL INTERVENTION. VEHICLE WAS STATIONARY, ENGINE RUNNING AND MOSTLY LEVEL STREET. WEATHER HAD BEEN RAINY BUT WAS NOT RAINING AT THE TIME, 63 DEGREE TEMP. NOT SURE IF IT WAS IN PARK OR DRIVE, BUT BRAKES WERE APPLIED AND OTHER PASSENGERS WERE ENTERING THE VEHICLE. THE NEXT MORNING THE POWER LIFTGATE HAS OPERATED NORMALLY.
Mfg Campaign: 10970539
Recall Date: Apr 4, 2017
General Motors, Llc
Defect Description:
VISIBILITY/WIPER
Potential Consequences:
THE PASSENGER WIPER BLADE DOES NOT COVER SUFFICIENT AREA OF THE WINDSHIELD TO PERMIT THE PASSENGER TO SEE THE 'RIGHT' PORTION OF THE ROAD. THE UNWIPED AREA ACCUMULATES DIRT AND ADDS TO THE VISUAL OBSTRUCTION OF FALLING RAIN. AN UNBELIEVABLE VISUAL DISTORTION OF THE ROAD RESULTS. I AM 70 AND AM APPALLED AT THE LACK OF WIPER COVERAGE IN A CRITICAL PORTION OF THE WINDSHIELD FOR THE PASSENGER. MOST PASSENGERS ASSIST THE DRIVER IN THE SAFE OPERATION OF THE VEHICLE BY CALLING ATTENTION TO IMPENDING PROBLEMS. THEIR CONTRIBUTION IS LIMITED IN THIS VEHICLE DUE TO THE POOR WIPER COVERAGE OF THE PASSENGER SIDE. THE PORTION OF THE CAR ABOVE THE BOTTOM OF THE WINDSHIELD WAS MOVED IN ON THE SIDES OF THE CAR BY DESIGN CHANGE. THE NORMAL SWATH OF THE PASSENGER WIPER FOR A FULL WIDTH CAR DOESL NOT WORK WITH THIS REDESIGN. THE PASSENGER WIPER PIVOT POINT SHOULD BE CLOSER TO THE FRONT OF THE PASSENGER AND WIPE TO THE RIGHT EDGE OF THE WINDSHIELD. HELP !!! THIS WIPER SITUATION IS REALLY AWFUL, UNNECESSARY, AND FATIGUING TO THE PASSENGER. THE A, B, AND C SECTIONS OF THE WINDSHIELD WERE SELECTED FOR THE SPECIFICATIONS WHEN WE HAD FULL WINDSHIELDS GOING TO THE RIGHT AND LEFT SIDES OF CAR. NOW THAT THE EDGES OF THE WINDSHIELD HAS BEEN MOVED IN, THE SPECIFICATION COVERAGE FOR THE PASSENGER IS NOT SUFFICIENT. THANKS FOR LISTENING AND HOPEFULLY, YOU CAN DO SOMETHING .... WE HATE DRIVING THIS CAR IN THE RAIN.
Corrective Action:
THE PASSENGER WIPER BLADE DOES NOT COVER SUFFICIENT AREA OF THE WINDSHIELD TO PERMIT THE PASSENGER TO SEE THE 'RIGHT' PORTION OF THE ROAD. THE UNWIPED AREA ACCUMULATES DIRT AND ADDS TO THE VISUAL OBSTRUCTION OF FALLING RAIN. AN UNBELIEVABLE VISUAL DISTORTION OF THE ROAD RESULTS. I AM 70 AND AM APPALLED AT THE LACK OF WIPER COVERAGE IN A CRITICAL PORTION OF THE WINDSHIELD FOR THE PASSENGER. MOST PASSENGERS ASSIST THE DRIVER IN THE SAFE OPERATION OF THE VEHICLE BY CALLING ATTENTION TO IMPENDING PROBLEMS. THEIR CONTRIBUTION IS LIMITED IN THIS VEHICLE DUE TO THE POOR WIPER COVERAGE OF THE PASSENGER SIDE. THE PORTION OF THE CAR ABOVE THE BOTTOM OF THE WINDSHIELD WAS MOVED IN ON THE SIDES OF THE CAR BY DESIGN CHANGE. THE NORMAL SWATH OF THE PASSENGER WIPER FOR A FULL WIDTH CAR DOESL NOT WORK WITH THIS REDESIGN. THE PASSENGER WIPER PIVOT POINT SHOULD BE CLOSER TO THE FRONT OF THE PASSENGER AND WIPE TO THE RIGHT EDGE OF THE WINDSHIELD. HELP !!! THIS WIPER SITUATION IS REALLY AWFUL, UNNECESSARY, AND FATIGUING TO THE PASSENGER. THE A, B, AND C SECTIONS OF THE WINDSHIELD WERE SELECTED FOR THE SPECIFICATIONS WHEN WE HAD FULL WINDSHIELDS GOING TO THE RIGHT AND LEFT SIDES OF CAR. NOW THAT THE EDGES OF THE WINDSHIELD HAS BEEN MOVED IN, THE SPECIFICATION COVERAGE FOR THE PASSENGER IS NOT SUFFICIENT. THANKS FOR LISTENING AND HOPEFULLY, YOU CAN DO SOMETHING .... WE HATE DRIVING THIS CAR IN THE RAIN.
Additional Notes:
THE PASSENGER WIPER BLADE DOES NOT COVER SUFFICIENT AREA OF THE WINDSHIELD TO PERMIT THE PASSENGER TO SEE THE 'RIGHT' PORTION OF THE ROAD. THE UNWIPED AREA ACCUMULATES DIRT AND ADDS TO THE VISUAL OBSTRUCTION OF FALLING RAIN. AN UNBELIEVABLE VISUAL DISTORTION OF THE ROAD RESULTS. I AM 70 AND AM APPALLED AT THE LACK OF WIPER COVERAGE IN A CRITICAL PORTION OF THE WINDSHIELD FOR THE PASSENGER. MOST PASSENGERS ASSIST THE DRIVER IN THE SAFE OPERATION OF THE VEHICLE BY CALLING ATTENTION TO IMPENDING PROBLEMS. THEIR CONTRIBUTION IS LIMITED IN THIS VEHICLE DUE TO THE POOR WIPER COVERAGE OF THE PASSENGER SIDE. THE PORTION OF THE CAR ABOVE THE BOTTOM OF THE WINDSHIELD WAS MOVED IN ON THE SIDES OF THE CAR BY DESIGN CHANGE. THE NORMAL SWATH OF THE PASSENGER WIPER FOR A FULL WIDTH CAR DOESL NOT WORK WITH THIS REDESIGN. THE PASSENGER WIPER PIVOT POINT SHOULD BE CLOSER TO THE FRONT OF THE PASSENGER AND WIPE TO THE RIGHT EDGE OF THE WINDSHIELD. HELP !!! THIS WIPER SITUATION IS REALLY AWFUL, UNNECESSARY, AND FATIGUING TO THE PASSENGER. THE A, B, AND C SECTIONS OF THE WINDSHIELD WERE SELECTED FOR THE SPECIFICATIONS WHEN WE HAD FULL WINDSHIELDS GOING TO THE RIGHT AND LEFT SIDES OF CAR. NOW THAT THE EDGES OF THE WINDSHIELD HAS BEEN MOVED IN, THE SPECIFICATION COVERAGE FOR THE PASSENGER IS NOT SUFFICIENT. THANKS FOR LISTENING AND HOPEFULLY, YOU CAN DO SOMETHING .... WE HATE DRIVING THIS CAR IN THE RAIN.
Mfg Campaign: 10969990
Recall Date: Apr 2, 2017
General Motors, Llc
Defect Description:
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
Potential Consequences:
SLT-2 WITH HALOGEN PROJECTOR BEAM HEADLIGHTS. VERY VERY POOR HIGH & LOW BEAM PERFORMANCE. THE 6YR OLD EQUINOX I TRADED IN DID A BETTER JOB OF LIGHTING THE ROAD IN FRONT OF YOU. HAD THE DEALER CHECKED THEM OUT AND SAID THEY WERE OK. I HAD THEM ADJUST THE LOW BEAM DOWN TO PROVIDE BETTER ROAD VISIBILITY BUT FORWARD ILLUMINATION DISTANCE IS LESS. THE SALES & SERVICE DEPARTMENT SAID THERE IS NOTHING THEY CAN DO BUT I COULD LOOK INTO AFTER MARKET HEADLIGHTS. CONTACTED GM CUSTOMER SERVICE (CASE # 8-2826579557), THEIR DESIGN TEAM REVIEWED MY CONCERN AND THEY HAVE NO PLANNED CHANGES TO IMPROVE THEIR HEADLIGHTS. IF THESE LIGHTS PASS ANY FEDERAL LIGHTING REQUIREMENTS, THE TESTING MUST HAVE BEEN DONE IN A LAB AND NOT OUT IN THE REAL WORLD. GM DID A LOT OF THINGS RIGHT ON THIS NEW DESIGNED ACADIA BUT THE HEADLIGHTS IS NOT ONE OF THEM. NEXT STEP IS TO LOOK FOR AFTER MARKET LIGHTS.
Corrective Action:
SLT-2 WITH HALOGEN PROJECTOR BEAM HEADLIGHTS. VERY VERY POOR HIGH & LOW BEAM PERFORMANCE. THE 6YR OLD EQUINOX I TRADED IN DID A BETTER JOB OF LIGHTING THE ROAD IN FRONT OF YOU. HAD THE DEALER CHECKED THEM OUT AND SAID THEY WERE OK. I HAD THEM ADJUST THE LOW BEAM DOWN TO PROVIDE BETTER ROAD VISIBILITY BUT FORWARD ILLUMINATION DISTANCE IS LESS. THE SALES & SERVICE DEPARTMENT SAID THERE IS NOTHING THEY CAN DO BUT I COULD LOOK INTO AFTER MARKET HEADLIGHTS. CONTACTED GM CUSTOMER SERVICE (CASE # 8-2826579557), THEIR DESIGN TEAM REVIEWED MY CONCERN AND THEY HAVE NO PLANNED CHANGES TO IMPROVE THEIR HEADLIGHTS. IF THESE LIGHTS PASS ANY FEDERAL LIGHTING REQUIREMENTS, THE TESTING MUST HAVE BEEN DONE IN A LAB AND NOT OUT IN THE REAL WORLD. GM DID A LOT OF THINGS RIGHT ON THIS NEW DESIGNED ACADIA BUT THE HEADLIGHTS IS NOT ONE OF THEM. NEXT STEP IS TO LOOK FOR AFTER MARKET LIGHTS.
Additional Notes:
SLT-2 WITH HALOGEN PROJECTOR BEAM HEADLIGHTS. VERY VERY POOR HIGH & LOW BEAM PERFORMANCE. THE 6YR OLD EQUINOX I TRADED IN DID A BETTER JOB OF LIGHTING THE ROAD IN FRONT OF YOU. HAD THE DEALER CHECKED THEM OUT AND SAID THEY WERE OK. I HAD THEM ADJUST THE LOW BEAM DOWN TO PROVIDE BETTER ROAD VISIBILITY BUT FORWARD ILLUMINATION DISTANCE IS LESS. THE SALES & SERVICE DEPARTMENT SAID THERE IS NOTHING THEY CAN DO BUT I COULD LOOK INTO AFTER MARKET HEADLIGHTS. CONTACTED GM CUSTOMER SERVICE (CASE # 8-2826579557), THEIR DESIGN TEAM REVIEWED MY CONCERN AND THEY HAVE NO PLANNED CHANGES TO IMPROVE THEIR HEADLIGHTS. IF THESE LIGHTS PASS ANY FEDERAL LIGHTING REQUIREMENTS, THE TESTING MUST HAVE BEEN DONE IN A LAB AND NOT OUT IN THE REAL WORLD. GM DID A LOT OF THINGS RIGHT ON THIS NEW DESIGNED ACADIA BUT THE HEADLIGHTS IS NOT ONE OF THEM. NEXT STEP IS TO LOOK FOR AFTER MARKET LIGHTS.
Mfg Campaign: 10967508
Recall Date: Mar 21, 2017
General Motors, Llc
Defect Description:
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM:HORN
Potential Consequences:
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2017 GMC ACADIA DENALI. WHILE DRIVING AT AN UNKNOWN SPEED, THE HORN FAILED TO SOUND. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A DEALER WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED THAT THE HORN WAS POORLY DESIGNED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER STATED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS FUNCTIONING AS DESIGNED. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 400.
Corrective Action:
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2017 GMC ACADIA DENALI. WHILE DRIVING AT AN UNKNOWN SPEED, THE HORN FAILED TO SOUND. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A DEALER WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED THAT THE HORN WAS POORLY DESIGNED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER STATED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS FUNCTIONING AS DESIGNED. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 400.
Additional Notes:
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2017 GMC ACADIA DENALI. WHILE DRIVING AT AN UNKNOWN SPEED, THE HORN FAILED TO SOUND. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A DEALER WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED THAT THE HORN WAS POORLY DESIGNED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER STATED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS FUNCTIONING AS DESIGNED. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 400.
Mfg Campaign: 10967376
Recall Date: Mar 20, 2017
General Motors, Llc
Defect Description:
SEAT BELTS
Potential Consequences:
STATIONARY, NEW VEHICLE POSSIBLY INAPPROPRIATELY EQUIPPED. A VEHICLE WITH A 2ND ROW BENCH SEAT PROVIDING SEATING FOR 3 WITH A CENTER OCCUPANT SEAT BELT BUT WITHOUT HEAD RESTRAINT (AND NO PROVISION FOR HEAD RESTRAINT). I CANNOT SEEM TO DETERMINE IF SUCH A CONFIGURATION DOES OR DOES NOT COMPLY WITH FEDERAL REGULATIONS. I CANNOT DETERMINE, THEREFORE, WHETHER I AM OR AM NOT LEGALLY ALLOWED TO CARRY A PASSENGER IN THE MIDDLE (INBOARD) SEAT.
Corrective Action:
STATIONARY, NEW VEHICLE POSSIBLY INAPPROPRIATELY EQUIPPED. A VEHICLE WITH A 2ND ROW BENCH SEAT PROVIDING SEATING FOR 3 WITH A CENTER OCCUPANT SEAT BELT BUT WITHOUT HEAD RESTRAINT (AND NO PROVISION FOR HEAD RESTRAINT). I CANNOT SEEM TO DETERMINE IF SUCH A CONFIGURATION DOES OR DOES NOT COMPLY WITH FEDERAL REGULATIONS. I CANNOT DETERMINE, THEREFORE, WHETHER I AM OR AM NOT LEGALLY ALLOWED TO CARRY A PASSENGER IN THE MIDDLE (INBOARD) SEAT.
Additional Notes:
STATIONARY, NEW VEHICLE POSSIBLY INAPPROPRIATELY EQUIPPED. A VEHICLE WITH A 2ND ROW BENCH SEAT PROVIDING SEATING FOR 3 WITH A CENTER OCCUPANT SEAT BELT BUT WITHOUT HEAD RESTRAINT (AND NO PROVISION FOR HEAD RESTRAINT). I CANNOT SEEM TO DETERMINE IF SUCH A CONFIGURATION DOES OR DOES NOT COMPLY WITH FEDERAL REGULATIONS. I CANNOT DETERMINE, THEREFORE, WHETHER I AM OR AM NOT LEGALLY ALLOWED TO CARRY A PASSENGER IN THE MIDDLE (INBOARD) SEAT.
Mfg Campaign: 10966669
Recall Date: Mar 18, 2017
General Motors, Llc
Defect Description:
SEATS
Potential Consequences:
STATIONARY, NEW VEHICLE POSSIBLY INAPPROPRIATELY EQUIPPED. A VEHICLE WITH A 2ND ROW BENCH SEAT PROVIDING SEATING FOR 3 WITH A CENTER OCCUPANT SEAT BELT BUT WITHOUT HEAD RESTRAINT (AND NO PROVISION FOR HEAD RESTRAINT). I CANNOT SEEM TO DETERMINE IF SUCH A CONFIGURATION DOES OR DOES NOT COMPLY WITH FEDERAL REGULATIONS. I CANNOT DETERMINE, THEREFORE, WHETHER I AM OR AM NOT LEGALLY ALLOWED TO CARRY A PASSENGER IN THE MIDDLE (INBOARD) SEAT.
Corrective Action:
STATIONARY, NEW VEHICLE POSSIBLY INAPPROPRIATELY EQUIPPED. A VEHICLE WITH A 2ND ROW BENCH SEAT PROVIDING SEATING FOR 3 WITH A CENTER OCCUPANT SEAT BELT BUT WITHOUT HEAD RESTRAINT (AND NO PROVISION FOR HEAD RESTRAINT). I CANNOT SEEM TO DETERMINE IF SUCH A CONFIGURATION DOES OR DOES NOT COMPLY WITH FEDERAL REGULATIONS. I CANNOT DETERMINE, THEREFORE, WHETHER I AM OR AM NOT LEGALLY ALLOWED TO CARRY A PASSENGER IN THE MIDDLE (INBOARD) SEAT.
Additional Notes:
STATIONARY, NEW VEHICLE POSSIBLY INAPPROPRIATELY EQUIPPED. A VEHICLE WITH A 2ND ROW BENCH SEAT PROVIDING SEATING FOR 3 WITH A CENTER OCCUPANT SEAT BELT BUT WITHOUT HEAD RESTRAINT (AND NO PROVISION FOR HEAD RESTRAINT). I CANNOT SEEM TO DETERMINE IF SUCH A CONFIGURATION DOES OR DOES NOT COMPLY WITH FEDERAL REGULATIONS. I CANNOT DETERMINE, THEREFORE, WHETHER I AM OR AM NOT LEGALLY ALLOWED TO CARRY A PASSENGER IN THE MIDDLE (INBOARD) SEAT.
Mfg Campaign: 10966669
Recall Date: Mar 18, 2017
General Motors, Llc
Defect Description:
UNKNOWN OR OTHER
Potential Consequences:
STATIONARY, NEW VEHICLE POSSIBLY INAPPROPRIATELY EQUIPPED. A VEHICLE WITH A 2ND ROW BENCH SEAT PROVIDING SEATING FOR 3 WITH A CENTER OCCUPANT SEAT BELT BUT WITHOUT HEAD RESTRAINT (AND NO PROVISION FOR HEAD RESTRAINT). I CANNOT SEEM TO DETERMINE IF SUCH A CONFIGURATION DOES OR DOES NOT COMPLY WITH FEDERAL REGULATIONS. I CANNOT DETERMINE, THEREFORE, WHETHER I AM OR AM NOT LEGALLY ALLOWED TO CARRY A PASSENGER IN THE MIDDLE (INBOARD) SEAT.
Corrective Action:
STATIONARY, NEW VEHICLE POSSIBLY INAPPROPRIATELY EQUIPPED. A VEHICLE WITH A 2ND ROW BENCH SEAT PROVIDING SEATING FOR 3 WITH A CENTER OCCUPANT SEAT BELT BUT WITHOUT HEAD RESTRAINT (AND NO PROVISION FOR HEAD RESTRAINT). I CANNOT SEEM TO DETERMINE IF SUCH A CONFIGURATION DOES OR DOES NOT COMPLY WITH FEDERAL REGULATIONS. I CANNOT DETERMINE, THEREFORE, WHETHER I AM OR AM NOT LEGALLY ALLOWED TO CARRY A PASSENGER IN THE MIDDLE (INBOARD) SEAT.
Additional Notes:
STATIONARY, NEW VEHICLE POSSIBLY INAPPROPRIATELY EQUIPPED. A VEHICLE WITH A 2ND ROW BENCH SEAT PROVIDING SEATING FOR 3 WITH A CENTER OCCUPANT SEAT BELT BUT WITHOUT HEAD RESTRAINT (AND NO PROVISION FOR HEAD RESTRAINT). I CANNOT SEEM TO DETERMINE IF SUCH A CONFIGURATION DOES OR DOES NOT COMPLY WITH FEDERAL REGULATIONS. I CANNOT DETERMINE, THEREFORE, WHETHER I AM OR AM NOT LEGALLY ALLOWED TO CARRY A PASSENGER IN THE MIDDLE (INBOARD) SEAT.
Mfg Campaign: 10966669
Recall Date: Mar 18, 2017
General Motors, Llc
Defect Description:
STEERING
Potential Consequences:
LESS THAN 30 DAYS OF TAKING POSSESSION OF THE VEHICLE BRAND NEW, WE NOTED A WHINE WHEN YOU TURNED THE STEERING WHEEL. WE BROUGHT THE VEH IN TO DEALERSHP AND IT WAS REPORTED THE AIRBAG COIL WAS WRAPPED AROUND STEERING COLUMN CAUSING THE NOISE. THE COIL WAS REPLACED AND VEH RETURNED TO ME. WITHIN 24 HOURS THE NOISE RETURNED. THIS TIME THEY DETERMINED IT WAS THE FRONT LEFT STRUT AND REPLACED. A BRAND NEW VEHICLE SHOULD NOT NEED A NEW STRUT. DEALERSHIP SAID THEY HAD ANOTHER ACADIA IN FOR SAME PROBLEM
Corrective Action:
LESS THAN 30 DAYS OF TAKING POSSESSION OF THE VEHICLE BRAND NEW, WE NOTED A WHINE WHEN YOU TURNED THE STEERING WHEEL. WE BROUGHT THE VEH IN TO DEALERSHP AND IT WAS REPORTED THE AIRBAG COIL WAS WRAPPED AROUND STEERING COLUMN CAUSING THE NOISE. THE COIL WAS REPLACED AND VEH RETURNED TO ME. WITHIN 24 HOURS THE NOISE RETURNED. THIS TIME THEY DETERMINED IT WAS THE FRONT LEFT STRUT AND REPLACED. A BRAND NEW VEHICLE SHOULD NOT NEED A NEW STRUT. DEALERSHIP SAID THEY HAD ANOTHER ACADIA IN FOR SAME PROBLEM
Additional Notes:
LESS THAN 30 DAYS OF TAKING POSSESSION OF THE VEHICLE BRAND NEW, WE NOTED A WHINE WHEN YOU TURNED THE STEERING WHEEL. WE BROUGHT THE VEH IN TO DEALERSHP AND IT WAS REPORTED THE AIRBAG COIL WAS WRAPPED AROUND STEERING COLUMN CAUSING THE NOISE. THE COIL WAS REPLACED AND VEH RETURNED TO ME. WITHIN 24 HOURS THE NOISE RETURNED. THIS TIME THEY DETERMINED IT WAS THE FRONT LEFT STRUT AND REPLACED. A BRAND NEW VEHICLE SHOULD NOT NEED A NEW STRUT. DEALERSHIP SAID THEY HAD ANOTHER ACADIA IN FOR SAME PROBLEM
Mfg Campaign: 10966625
Recall Date: Mar 17, 2017
General Motors, Llc
Defect Description:
SUSPENSION
Potential Consequences:
LESS THAN 30 DAYS OF TAKING POSSESSION OF THE VEHICLE BRAND NEW, WE NOTED A WHINE WHEN YOU TURNED THE STEERING WHEEL. WE BROUGHT THE VEH IN TO DEALERSHP AND IT WAS REPORTED THE AIRBAG COIL WAS WRAPPED AROUND STEERING COLUMN CAUSING THE NOISE. THE COIL WAS REPLACED AND VEH RETURNED TO ME. WITHIN 24 HOURS THE NOISE RETURNED. THIS TIME THEY DETERMINED IT WAS THE FRONT LEFT STRUT AND REPLACED. A BRAND NEW VEHICLE SHOULD NOT NEED A NEW STRUT. DEALERSHIP SAID THEY HAD ANOTHER ACADIA IN FOR SAME PROBLEM
Corrective Action:
LESS THAN 30 DAYS OF TAKING POSSESSION OF THE VEHICLE BRAND NEW, WE NOTED A WHINE WHEN YOU TURNED THE STEERING WHEEL. WE BROUGHT THE VEH IN TO DEALERSHP AND IT WAS REPORTED THE AIRBAG COIL WAS WRAPPED AROUND STEERING COLUMN CAUSING THE NOISE. THE COIL WAS REPLACED AND VEH RETURNED TO ME. WITHIN 24 HOURS THE NOISE RETURNED. THIS TIME THEY DETERMINED IT WAS THE FRONT LEFT STRUT AND REPLACED. A BRAND NEW VEHICLE SHOULD NOT NEED A NEW STRUT. DEALERSHIP SAID THEY HAD ANOTHER ACADIA IN FOR SAME PROBLEM
Additional Notes:
LESS THAN 30 DAYS OF TAKING POSSESSION OF THE VEHICLE BRAND NEW, WE NOTED A WHINE WHEN YOU TURNED THE STEERING WHEEL. WE BROUGHT THE VEH IN TO DEALERSHP AND IT WAS REPORTED THE AIRBAG COIL WAS WRAPPED AROUND STEERING COLUMN CAUSING THE NOISE. THE COIL WAS REPLACED AND VEH RETURNED TO ME. WITHIN 24 HOURS THE NOISE RETURNED. THIS TIME THEY DETERMINED IT WAS THE FRONT LEFT STRUT AND REPLACED. A BRAND NEW VEHICLE SHOULD NOT NEED A NEW STRUT. DEALERSHIP SAID THEY HAD ANOTHER ACADIA IN FOR SAME PROBLEM
Mfg Campaign: 10966625
Recall Date: Mar 17, 2017
General Motors, Llc
Defect Description:
UNKNOWN OR OTHER
Potential Consequences:
WHEN THE SUV GOES FROM 6 CYLINDERS TO 4 IT MAKES A VIBRATING NOISE LIKE A HELICOPTER OVER HEAD THEY SAY THIS IS NORMAL BUT IT IS EXTREMELY IRRITATING I FOUND OUT THAT OTHER PEOPLE HAVE COMPLAINED BUT IT APPEARS NOTHING IS BEING DONE THIS NOISE HAS TO BE FIXED
Corrective Action:
WHEN THE SUV GOES FROM 6 CYLINDERS TO 4 IT MAKES A VIBRATING NOISE LIKE A HELICOPTER OVER HEAD THEY SAY THIS IS NORMAL BUT IT IS EXTREMELY IRRITATING I FOUND OUT THAT OTHER PEOPLE HAVE COMPLAINED BUT IT APPEARS NOTHING IS BEING DONE THIS NOISE HAS TO BE FIXED
Additional Notes:
WHEN THE SUV GOES FROM 6 CYLINDERS TO 4 IT MAKES A VIBRATING NOISE LIKE A HELICOPTER OVER HEAD THEY SAY THIS IS NORMAL BUT IT IS EXTREMELY IRRITATING I FOUND OUT THAT OTHER PEOPLE HAVE COMPLAINED BUT IT APPEARS NOTHING IS BEING DONE THIS NOISE HAS TO BE FIXED
Mfg Campaign: 10960331
Recall Date: Mar 13, 2017
General Motors, Llc
Defect Description:
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
Potential Consequences:
I BOUGHT A NEW 2017 GMC ACADIA DENALI THE END OF FEBRUARY AND THE NEXT DAY FOUND OUT THAT THE HORN DOES NOT WORK. THE HORN IS EXTREMELY HARD TO PUSH AND REQUIRES EXTRA PRESSURE WITH BOTH HANDS AND ARCHING MY BACK AGAINST THE SEAT TO TRY AND MAKE THE HORN TO WORK. I HAVE BEEN BACK TO THE DEALERS 3 TIMES IN 2 WEEKS AND IT IS NOT FIXED. THERE ARE ONLY 644 MILES ON THIS NEW SUV AND MY WIFE WILL NOT DRIVE IT BECAUSE IT IS A SAFETY CONCERN WITH NO HORN. *TR
Corrective Action:
I BOUGHT A NEW 2017 GMC ACADIA DENALI THE END OF FEBRUARY AND THE NEXT DAY FOUND OUT THAT THE HORN DOES NOT WORK. THE HORN IS EXTREMELY HARD TO PUSH AND REQUIRES EXTRA PRESSURE WITH BOTH HANDS AND ARCHING MY BACK AGAINST THE SEAT TO TRY AND MAKE THE HORN TO WORK. I HAVE BEEN BACK TO THE DEALERS 3 TIMES IN 2 WEEKS AND IT IS NOT FIXED. THERE ARE ONLY 644 MILES ON THIS NEW SUV AND MY WIFE WILL NOT DRIVE IT BECAUSE IT IS A SAFETY CONCERN WITH NO HORN. *TR
Additional Notes:
I BOUGHT A NEW 2017 GMC ACADIA DENALI THE END OF FEBRUARY AND THE NEXT DAY FOUND OUT THAT THE HORN DOES NOT WORK. THE HORN IS EXTREMELY HARD TO PUSH AND REQUIRES EXTRA PRESSURE WITH BOTH HANDS AND ARCHING MY BACK AGAINST THE SEAT TO TRY AND MAKE THE HORN TO WORK. I HAVE BEEN BACK TO THE DEALERS 3 TIMES IN 2 WEEKS AND IT IS NOT FIXED. THERE ARE ONLY 644 MILES ON THIS NEW SUV AND MY WIFE WILL NOT DRIVE IT BECAUSE IT IS A SAFETY CONCERN WITH NO HORN. *TR
Mfg Campaign: 10960225
Recall Date: Mar 12, 2017
General Motors, Llc
Defect Description:
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
Potential Consequences:
HORN HAS NOT WORKED FROM DAY ONE. DEALER SAYS CAN'T FIX UNTIL GM REDESIGNS A SOLUTION. SAD.
Corrective Action:
HORN HAS NOT WORKED FROM DAY ONE. DEALER SAYS CAN'T FIX UNTIL GM REDESIGNS A SOLUTION. SAD.
Additional Notes:
HORN HAS NOT WORKED FROM DAY ONE. DEALER SAYS CAN'T FIX UNTIL GM REDESIGNS A SOLUTION. SAD.
Mfg Campaign: 10960075
Recall Date: Mar 10, 2017
General Motors, Llc
Defect Description:
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
Potential Consequences:
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2017 GMC ACADIA. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE HORN TOOK EXCESSIVE FORCE IN ORDER TO OPERATE. AS A RESULT, THE VEHICLE WAS INVOLVED IN AN SIDE IMPACT COLLISION BECAUSE THE DRIVER COULD NOT ALERT THE OTHER DRIVER OF THEIR PRESENCE. A POLICE REPORT WAS NOT FILED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE COLLISION CENTER WHERE IT WAS REPAIRED. THE CONTACT WAS ALSO INFORMED BY THE DEALER THAT THIS FAILURE WAS COMMON AMONG THIS PARTICULAR MODEL VEHICLE. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE MANUFACTURER STATED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS DESIGNED WITH THAT PARTICULAR FAILURE. THERE WERE NO INJURIES. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 600.
Corrective Action:
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2017 GMC ACADIA. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE HORN TOOK EXCESSIVE FORCE IN ORDER TO OPERATE. AS A RESULT, THE VEHICLE WAS INVOLVED IN AN SIDE IMPACT COLLISION BECAUSE THE DRIVER COULD NOT ALERT THE OTHER DRIVER OF THEIR PRESENCE. A POLICE REPORT WAS NOT FILED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE COLLISION CENTER WHERE IT WAS REPAIRED. THE CONTACT WAS ALSO INFORMED BY THE DEALER THAT THIS FAILURE WAS COMMON AMONG THIS PARTICULAR MODEL VEHICLE. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE MANUFACTURER STATED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS DESIGNED WITH THAT PARTICULAR FAILURE. THERE WERE NO INJURIES. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 600.
Additional Notes:
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2017 GMC ACADIA. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE HORN TOOK EXCESSIVE FORCE IN ORDER TO OPERATE. AS A RESULT, THE VEHICLE WAS INVOLVED IN AN SIDE IMPACT COLLISION BECAUSE THE DRIVER COULD NOT ALERT THE OTHER DRIVER OF THEIR PRESENCE. A POLICE REPORT WAS NOT FILED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE COLLISION CENTER WHERE IT WAS REPAIRED. THE CONTACT WAS ALSO INFORMED BY THE DEALER THAT THIS FAILURE WAS COMMON AMONG THIS PARTICULAR MODEL VEHICLE. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE MANUFACTURER STATED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS DESIGNED WITH THAT PARTICULAR FAILURE. THERE WERE NO INJURIES. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 600.
Mfg Campaign: 10959804
Recall Date: Mar 9, 2017
General Motors, Llc
Defect Description:
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM:HORN
Potential Consequences:
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2017 GMC ACADIA. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE HORN TOOK EXCESSIVE FORCE IN ORDER TO OPERATE. AS A RESULT, THE VEHICLE WAS INVOLVED IN AN SIDE IMPACT COLLISION BECAUSE THE DRIVER COULD NOT ALERT THE OTHER DRIVER OF THEIR PRESENCE. A POLICE REPORT WAS NOT FILED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE COLLISION CENTER WHERE IT WAS REPAIRED. THE CONTACT WAS ALSO INFORMED BY THE DEALER THAT THIS FAILURE WAS COMMON AMONG THIS PARTICULAR MODEL VEHICLE. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE MANUFACTURER STATED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS DESIGNED WITH THAT PARTICULAR FAILURE. THERE WERE NO INJURIES. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 600.
Corrective Action:
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2017 GMC ACADIA. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE HORN TOOK EXCESSIVE FORCE IN ORDER TO OPERATE. AS A RESULT, THE VEHICLE WAS INVOLVED IN AN SIDE IMPACT COLLISION BECAUSE THE DRIVER COULD NOT ALERT THE OTHER DRIVER OF THEIR PRESENCE. A POLICE REPORT WAS NOT FILED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE COLLISION CENTER WHERE IT WAS REPAIRED. THE CONTACT WAS ALSO INFORMED BY THE DEALER THAT THIS FAILURE WAS COMMON AMONG THIS PARTICULAR MODEL VEHICLE. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE MANUFACTURER STATED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS DESIGNED WITH THAT PARTICULAR FAILURE. THERE WERE NO INJURIES. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 600.
Additional Notes:
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2017 GMC ACADIA. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE HORN TOOK EXCESSIVE FORCE IN ORDER TO OPERATE. AS A RESULT, THE VEHICLE WAS INVOLVED IN AN SIDE IMPACT COLLISION BECAUSE THE DRIVER COULD NOT ALERT THE OTHER DRIVER OF THEIR PRESENCE. A POLICE REPORT WAS NOT FILED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE COLLISION CENTER WHERE IT WAS REPAIRED. THE CONTACT WAS ALSO INFORMED BY THE DEALER THAT THIS FAILURE WAS COMMON AMONG THIS PARTICULAR MODEL VEHICLE. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE MANUFACTURER STATED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS DESIGNED WITH THAT PARTICULAR FAILURE. THERE WERE NO INJURIES. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 600.
Mfg Campaign: 10959804
Recall Date: Mar 9, 2017
Need Legal Help?
Featured Attorneys
Barry Edzant
Edzant Price LLC
Valencia, CA • 36 yrs
Focus: Lemon Law, Personal Injury
Recent Articles
Jeep Grand Cherokee Head Restraint Problem
Chrysler (FCA US, LLC) has announced a safety issue affecting certain 2023–2024 Jeep Grand Ch ...
Aug 1, 2025Fuel Injector Problem: 2021-2024 Ford Bronco Sport and 2020-2022 Ford Escape
If you own a 2021-2024 Ford Bronco Sport or 2020-2022 Ford Escape equipped with a 1.5L Dragon GTDI e ...
Jul 28, 2025