Complaints & Recalls
Official Safety Recalls - Important!
3 RecallsThese are official manufacturer recalls ordered by NHTSA for safety defects. If you own this vehicle, contact your dealer immediately for free repairs.
Forest River, Inc.
Safety Issue:
Forest River, Inc. (Forest River) is recalling certain 2018-2020 Dynamax Isata motorhomes. The slim-rack slide out mechanisms may activate unintentionally, extending or retracting the slide room unexpectedly.
Potential Risk:
FREE Recall Solution:
Additional Details:
Owners may also contact the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Vehicle Safety Hotline at 1-888-327-4236 (TTY 1-800-424-9153), or go to www.safercar.gov.
Mfg Campaign: 55-1030
Recall Date: Dec 18, 2019
Forest River, Inc.
Safety Issue:
Forest River, Inc. (Forest River) is recalling certain 2018 Dynamax Isata vehicles built on a RAM chassis and equipped with a column shifter. Pushing the brake pedal for prolonged periods when the vehicle is running and in PARK may cause the Brake Transmission Shift Interlock (BTSI) pin to stick in the open position. With the pin in the open position, the transmission can be shifted out of PARK into any gear without pushing the brake pedal or having the key in the ignition.
Potential Risk:
FREE Recall Solution:
Additional Details:
Owners may also contact the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Vehicle Safety Hotline at 1-888-327-4236 (TTY 1-800-424-9153), or go to www.safercar.gov.
Mfg Campaign: 55-0993
Recall Date: Apr 11, 2019
Forest River, Inc.
Safety Issue:
Forest River, Inc. (Forest River) is recalling certain 2017-2018 Dynamax Isata vehicles, models ISC36DSD, ISC35DBD, ISC36DSD4X4, built on RAM chassis equipped with Cummins 6.7L Turbo Diesel engines that have Concentric-brand water pumps without a vent hole. These water pumps may leak coolant.
Potential Risk:
FREE Recall Solution:
Additional Details:
Owners may also contact the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Vehicle Safety Hotline at 1-888-327-4236 (TTY 1-800-424-9153), or go to www.safercar.gov.
Mfg Campaign: 55-0564
Recall Date: Nov 10, 2017
Consumer Complaints
6 ComplaintsForest River, Inc.
Defect Description:
SERVICE BRAKES
Potential Consequences:
ABS light and warning bell on and sounding. Traction control light also on. Diagnostic shows error code c0020-01, ABS pump motor electrical failure. A canvass of every Dodge/Chrysler part supplier and all other possible parts suppliers including junk yards in the US and Canada revealed “no part (ABS Hydraulic Unit, 6834. 7099 AC) is available anywhere in the US or Canada. I was advised that it would be unsafe to drive the vehicle. I am stuck 2400 miles from my home with no solutions from anyone including Dynamax and Chrysler.
Corrective Action:
ABS light and warning bell on and sounding. Traction control light also on. Diagnostic shows error code c0020-01, ABS pump motor electrical failure. A canvass of every Dodge/Chrysler part supplier and all other possible parts suppliers including junk yards in the US and Canada revealed “no part (ABS Hydraulic Unit, 6834. 7099 AC) is available anywhere in the US or Canada. I was advised that it would be unsafe to drive the vehicle. I am stuck 2400 miles from my home with no solutions from anyone including Dynamax and Chrysler.
Additional Notes:
ABS light and warning bell on and sounding. Traction control light also on. Diagnostic shows error code c0020-01, ABS pump motor electrical failure. A canvass of every Dodge/Chrysler part supplier and all other possible parts suppliers including junk yards in the US and Canada revealed “no part (ABS Hydraulic Unit, 6834. 7099 AC) is available anywhere in the US or Canada. I was advised that it would be unsafe to drive the vehicle. I am stuck 2400 miles from my home with no solutions from anyone including Dynamax and Chrysler.
Mfg Campaign: 11602359
Recall Date: Jul 15, 2024
Forest River, Inc.
Defect Description:
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
Potential Consequences:
The ABS (anti lock braking system) module failed resulting in ongoing beeping with display warning to service the system, and intermittent failure of other electrical features. A local mechanic diagnosed the problem and recommended replacement of the module. The Dynamax RV is a coach built on a Ram 5500 chassis. I was able to obtain a new replacement ABS module, but then learned that it had to be installed and "flashed" (programmed) by a dealer. I contacted Dynamax (now owned by Forest River), but have not received a reply. I then contacted the five nearest Ram dealers in my area. All of them told me that they could not help me because my vehicle is too big for their shop. I don't know if this problem affects my braking , but it appears that I am stuck with no solution. I hope you can help me. Any help would be appreciated.
Corrective Action:
The ABS (anti lock braking system) module failed resulting in ongoing beeping with display warning to service the system, and intermittent failure of other electrical features. A local mechanic diagnosed the problem and recommended replacement of the module. The Dynamax RV is a coach built on a Ram 5500 chassis. I was able to obtain a new replacement ABS module, but then learned that it had to be installed and "flashed" (programmed) by a dealer. I contacted Dynamax (now owned by Forest River), but have not received a reply. I then contacted the five nearest Ram dealers in my area. All of them told me that they could not help me because my vehicle is too big for their shop. I don't know if this problem affects my braking , but it appears that I am stuck with no solution. I hope you can help me. Any help would be appreciated.
Additional Notes:
The ABS (anti lock braking system) module failed resulting in ongoing beeping with display warning to service the system, and intermittent failure of other electrical features. A local mechanic diagnosed the problem and recommended replacement of the module. The Dynamax RV is a coach built on a Ram 5500 chassis. I was able to obtain a new replacement ABS module, but then learned that it had to be installed and "flashed" (programmed) by a dealer. I contacted Dynamax (now owned by Forest River), but have not received a reply. I then contacted the five nearest Ram dealers in my area. All of them told me that they could not help me because my vehicle is too big for their shop. I don't know if this problem affects my braking , but it appears that I am stuck with no solution. I hope you can help me. Any help would be appreciated.
Mfg Campaign: 11490862
Recall Date: Oct 25, 2022
Forest River, Inc.
Defect Description:
FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE: AUTOMATIC EMERGENCY BRAKING
Potential Consequences:
The ABS (anti lock braking system) module failed resulting in ongoing beeping with display warning to service the system, and intermittent failure of other electrical features. A local mechanic diagnosed the problem and recommended replacement of the module. The Dynamax RV is a coach built on a Ram 5500 chassis. I was able to obtain a new replacement ABS module, but then learned that it had to be installed and "flashed" (programmed) by a dealer. I contacted Dynamax (now owned by Forest River), but have not received a reply. I then contacted the five nearest Ram dealers in my area. All of them told me that they could not help me because my vehicle is too big for their shop. I don't know if this problem affects my braking , but it appears that I am stuck with no solution. I hope you can help me. Any help would be appreciated.
Corrective Action:
The ABS (anti lock braking system) module failed resulting in ongoing beeping with display warning to service the system, and intermittent failure of other electrical features. A local mechanic diagnosed the problem and recommended replacement of the module. The Dynamax RV is a coach built on a Ram 5500 chassis. I was able to obtain a new replacement ABS module, but then learned that it had to be installed and "flashed" (programmed) by a dealer. I contacted Dynamax (now owned by Forest River), but have not received a reply. I then contacted the five nearest Ram dealers in my area. All of them told me that they could not help me because my vehicle is too big for their shop. I don't know if this problem affects my braking , but it appears that I am stuck with no solution. I hope you can help me. Any help would be appreciated.
Additional Notes:
The ABS (anti lock braking system) module failed resulting in ongoing beeping with display warning to service the system, and intermittent failure of other electrical features. A local mechanic diagnosed the problem and recommended replacement of the module. The Dynamax RV is a coach built on a Ram 5500 chassis. I was able to obtain a new replacement ABS module, but then learned that it had to be installed and "flashed" (programmed) by a dealer. I contacted Dynamax (now owned by Forest River), but have not received a reply. I then contacted the five nearest Ram dealers in my area. All of them told me that they could not help me because my vehicle is too big for their shop. I don't know if this problem affects my braking , but it appears that I am stuck with no solution. I hope you can help me. Any help would be appreciated.
Mfg Campaign: 11490862
Recall Date: Oct 25, 2022
Forest River, Inc.
Defect Description:
SERVICE BRAKES
Potential Consequences:
WE PURCHASED THIS MOTORHOME ON 8/12/19. THE LEVELING SYSTEM WAS NOT WORKING SO UPON CRAWLING UNDERNEATH TO FIND OUT WHAT WAS LEAKING WE DISCOVERED A COUPLING IN THE MODIFIED BRAKE LINE LEAKING. WE CHECKED THE BRAKE FLUID AND HALF WAS GONE. WE CONTACTED DYNAMAX WHO CLAIMED IT WAS CHRYSLERS RESPONSIBILITY. WE TOOK IT TO CHRYSLER AND THEY INFORMED US IT WAS MODIFIED AND NOT THEY'RE RESPONSIBILITY. WE THEN FOUND A STICKER THAT SAID IT HAD BEEN MODIFIED BY MOR/RYDE. WE CALLED THEM AND THEY DID NOT KNOW. WE AGAIN CALLED DYNAMAX AGAIN AFTER 3 DAYS OF RUN AROUND AND THEY FINALLY CALLED MOR/RYDE TO CONFIRM THAT THEY HAD MODIFIED THE BRAKE LINES. OUR BRAND NEW MOTORHOME IS SITTING AT THE CHRYSLER DEALER WHO AT THIS POINT IS REFUSING TO DO ANY FURTHER WORK ON IT DUE TO THE MODIFICATION. WHAT DO WE DO NOW? THE VEHICLE WAS PARKED WHEN WE FOUND THE LEAK BUT WE HAD JUST DRIVEN IT OVER 300 MILES TO GET HOME. THE LEAK WAS CAUSED BY MOR/RYDE EXTENDING THE BRAKE LINE USING A COUPLING WHICH IT WHERE THE VERY BAD LEAK IS.*DT*DT *AS
Corrective Action:
WE PURCHASED THIS MOTORHOME ON 8/12/19. THE LEVELING SYSTEM WAS NOT WORKING SO UPON CRAWLING UNDERNEATH TO FIND OUT WHAT WAS LEAKING WE DISCOVERED A COUPLING IN THE MODIFIED BRAKE LINE LEAKING. WE CHECKED THE BRAKE FLUID AND HALF WAS GONE. WE CONTACTED DYNAMAX WHO CLAIMED IT WAS CHRYSLERS RESPONSIBILITY. WE TOOK IT TO CHRYSLER AND THEY INFORMED US IT WAS MODIFIED AND NOT THEY'RE RESPONSIBILITY. WE THEN FOUND A STICKER THAT SAID IT HAD BEEN MODIFIED BY MOR/RYDE. WE CALLED THEM AND THEY DID NOT KNOW. WE AGAIN CALLED DYNAMAX AGAIN AFTER 3 DAYS OF RUN AROUND AND THEY FINALLY CALLED MOR/RYDE TO CONFIRM THAT THEY HAD MODIFIED THE BRAKE LINES. OUR BRAND NEW MOTORHOME IS SITTING AT THE CHRYSLER DEALER WHO AT THIS POINT IS REFUSING TO DO ANY FURTHER WORK ON IT DUE TO THE MODIFICATION. WHAT DO WE DO NOW? THE VEHICLE WAS PARKED WHEN WE FOUND THE LEAK BUT WE HAD JUST DRIVEN IT OVER 300 MILES TO GET HOME. THE LEAK WAS CAUSED BY MOR/RYDE EXTENDING THE BRAKE LINE USING A COUPLING WHICH IT WHERE THE VERY BAD LEAK IS.*DT*DT *AS
Additional Notes:
WE PURCHASED THIS MOTORHOME ON 8/12/19. THE LEVELING SYSTEM WAS NOT WORKING SO UPON CRAWLING UNDERNEATH TO FIND OUT WHAT WAS LEAKING WE DISCOVERED A COUPLING IN THE MODIFIED BRAKE LINE LEAKING. WE CHECKED THE BRAKE FLUID AND HALF WAS GONE. WE CONTACTED DYNAMAX WHO CLAIMED IT WAS CHRYSLERS RESPONSIBILITY. WE TOOK IT TO CHRYSLER AND THEY INFORMED US IT WAS MODIFIED AND NOT THEY'RE RESPONSIBILITY. WE THEN FOUND A STICKER THAT SAID IT HAD BEEN MODIFIED BY MOR/RYDE. WE CALLED THEM AND THEY DID NOT KNOW. WE AGAIN CALLED DYNAMAX AGAIN AFTER 3 DAYS OF RUN AROUND AND THEY FINALLY CALLED MOR/RYDE TO CONFIRM THAT THEY HAD MODIFIED THE BRAKE LINES. OUR BRAND NEW MOTORHOME IS SITTING AT THE CHRYSLER DEALER WHO AT THIS POINT IS REFUSING TO DO ANY FURTHER WORK ON IT DUE TO THE MODIFICATION. WHAT DO WE DO NOW? THE VEHICLE WAS PARKED WHEN WE FOUND THE LEAK BUT WE HAD JUST DRIVEN IT OVER 300 MILES TO GET HOME. THE LEAK WAS CAUSED BY MOR/RYDE EXTENDING THE BRAKE LINE USING A COUPLING WHICH IT WHERE THE VERY BAD LEAK IS.*DT*DT *AS
Mfg Campaign: 11245359
Recall Date: Aug 20, 2019
Forest River, Inc.
Defect Description:
AIR BAGS
Potential Consequences:
VEHICLE IS A 2018 MERCEDES BENZ SPRINTER-BASED 24 FT MOTORHOME. IT WAS STATIONARY WITH ENGINE OFF. WHEN ROTATING THE DRIVER'S SWIVEL SEAT 180 DEGREES (WHICH IT IS DESIGNED TO DO), UNDERSEAT WIRING WAS SEVERED DUE TO IMPROPER WIRE ROUTING BY THE "UPFITTER" (DYNAMAX CORP), THUS CAUSING AN INSTRUMENT PANEL WARNING OF "SRS FAULT; PROCEED IMMEDIATELY TO REPAIR FACILITY". THIS ANALYSIS WAS MADE BY MERCEDES BENZ OF KANSAS CITY SERVICE DEPARTMENT WHERE A REPAIR WAS PERFORMED. MERCEDES BENZ REFUSED COVERAGE UNDER THE CHASSIS WARRANTY SO I PAID THE REPAIR COST OUT OF POCKET ($388.90). I SUBSEQUENTLY WROTE A LETTER TO DYNAMAX REQUESTING REIMBURSEMENT. SEE ATTACHED PDF INCLUDING MB SERVICE INVOICE AND PAYMENT RECEIPT. I RECEIVED NO RESPONSE FROM DYNAMAX FOR TWO MONTHS. UPON FOLLOWING UP WITH DYNAMAX BY PHONE ON 7/8/2019, I WAS TOLD THE REIMBURSEMENT REQUEST WAS DENIED BECAUSE I WAS NOT THE ORIGINAL PURCHASER OF THE VEHICLE AND THEREFORE NOT COVERED UNDER THEIR WARRANTY. REGARDLESS OF THEIR WARRANTY POLICY, I BELIEVE AN INOPERATIVE AIRBAG SYSTEM CAUSED BY A MANUFACTURING DEFECT CONSTITUTES A SERIOUS SAFETY HAZARD, THE REPAIR COST OF WHICH SHOULD BE BORNE BY THE MANUFACTURER, NOT THE CONSUMER.
Corrective Action:
VEHICLE IS A 2018 MERCEDES BENZ SPRINTER-BASED 24 FT MOTORHOME. IT WAS STATIONARY WITH ENGINE OFF. WHEN ROTATING THE DRIVER'S SWIVEL SEAT 180 DEGREES (WHICH IT IS DESIGNED TO DO), UNDERSEAT WIRING WAS SEVERED DUE TO IMPROPER WIRE ROUTING BY THE "UPFITTER" (DYNAMAX CORP), THUS CAUSING AN INSTRUMENT PANEL WARNING OF "SRS FAULT; PROCEED IMMEDIATELY TO REPAIR FACILITY". THIS ANALYSIS WAS MADE BY MERCEDES BENZ OF KANSAS CITY SERVICE DEPARTMENT WHERE A REPAIR WAS PERFORMED. MERCEDES BENZ REFUSED COVERAGE UNDER THE CHASSIS WARRANTY SO I PAID THE REPAIR COST OUT OF POCKET ($388.90). I SUBSEQUENTLY WROTE A LETTER TO DYNAMAX REQUESTING REIMBURSEMENT. SEE ATTACHED PDF INCLUDING MB SERVICE INVOICE AND PAYMENT RECEIPT. I RECEIVED NO RESPONSE FROM DYNAMAX FOR TWO MONTHS. UPON FOLLOWING UP WITH DYNAMAX BY PHONE ON 7/8/2019, I WAS TOLD THE REIMBURSEMENT REQUEST WAS DENIED BECAUSE I WAS NOT THE ORIGINAL PURCHASER OF THE VEHICLE AND THEREFORE NOT COVERED UNDER THEIR WARRANTY. REGARDLESS OF THEIR WARRANTY POLICY, I BELIEVE AN INOPERATIVE AIRBAG SYSTEM CAUSED BY A MANUFACTURING DEFECT CONSTITUTES A SERIOUS SAFETY HAZARD, THE REPAIR COST OF WHICH SHOULD BE BORNE BY THE MANUFACTURER, NOT THE CONSUMER.
Additional Notes:
VEHICLE IS A 2018 MERCEDES BENZ SPRINTER-BASED 24 FT MOTORHOME. IT WAS STATIONARY WITH ENGINE OFF. WHEN ROTATING THE DRIVER'S SWIVEL SEAT 180 DEGREES (WHICH IT IS DESIGNED TO DO), UNDERSEAT WIRING WAS SEVERED DUE TO IMPROPER WIRE ROUTING BY THE "UPFITTER" (DYNAMAX CORP), THUS CAUSING AN INSTRUMENT PANEL WARNING OF "SRS FAULT; PROCEED IMMEDIATELY TO REPAIR FACILITY". THIS ANALYSIS WAS MADE BY MERCEDES BENZ OF KANSAS CITY SERVICE DEPARTMENT WHERE A REPAIR WAS PERFORMED. MERCEDES BENZ REFUSED COVERAGE UNDER THE CHASSIS WARRANTY SO I PAID THE REPAIR COST OUT OF POCKET ($388.90). I SUBSEQUENTLY WROTE A LETTER TO DYNAMAX REQUESTING REIMBURSEMENT. SEE ATTACHED PDF INCLUDING MB SERVICE INVOICE AND PAYMENT RECEIPT. I RECEIVED NO RESPONSE FROM DYNAMAX FOR TWO MONTHS. UPON FOLLOWING UP WITH DYNAMAX BY PHONE ON 7/8/2019, I WAS TOLD THE REIMBURSEMENT REQUEST WAS DENIED BECAUSE I WAS NOT THE ORIGINAL PURCHASER OF THE VEHICLE AND THEREFORE NOT COVERED UNDER THEIR WARRANTY. REGARDLESS OF THEIR WARRANTY POLICY, I BELIEVE AN INOPERATIVE AIRBAG SYSTEM CAUSED BY A MANUFACTURING DEFECT CONSTITUTES A SERIOUS SAFETY HAZARD, THE REPAIR COST OF WHICH SHOULD BE BORNE BY THE MANUFACTURER, NOT THE CONSUMER.
Mfg Campaign: 11230260
Recall Date: Jul 8, 2019
Forest River, Inc.
Defect Description:
SEAT BELTS
Potential Consequences:
VEHICLE IS A 2018 MERCEDES BENZ SPRINTER-BASED 24 FT MOTORHOME. IT WAS STATIONARY WITH ENGINE OFF. WHEN ROTATING THE DRIVER'S SWIVEL SEAT 180 DEGREES (WHICH IT IS DESIGNED TO DO), UNDERSEAT WIRING WAS SEVERED DUE TO IMPROPER WIRE ROUTING BY THE "UPFITTER" (DYNAMAX CORP), THUS CAUSING AN INSTRUMENT PANEL WARNING OF "SRS FAULT; PROCEED IMMEDIATELY TO REPAIR FACILITY". THIS ANALYSIS WAS MADE BY MERCEDES BENZ OF KANSAS CITY SERVICE DEPARTMENT WHERE A REPAIR WAS PERFORMED. MERCEDES BENZ REFUSED COVERAGE UNDER THE CHASSIS WARRANTY SO I PAID THE REPAIR COST OUT OF POCKET ($388.90). I SUBSEQUENTLY WROTE A LETTER TO DYNAMAX REQUESTING REIMBURSEMENT. SEE ATTACHED PDF INCLUDING MB SERVICE INVOICE AND PAYMENT RECEIPT. I RECEIVED NO RESPONSE FROM DYNAMAX FOR TWO MONTHS. UPON FOLLOWING UP WITH DYNAMAX BY PHONE ON 7/8/2019, I WAS TOLD THE REIMBURSEMENT REQUEST WAS DENIED BECAUSE I WAS NOT THE ORIGINAL PURCHASER OF THE VEHICLE AND THEREFORE NOT COVERED UNDER THEIR WARRANTY. REGARDLESS OF THEIR WARRANTY POLICY, I BELIEVE AN INOPERATIVE AIRBAG SYSTEM CAUSED BY A MANUFACTURING DEFECT CONSTITUTES A SERIOUS SAFETY HAZARD, THE REPAIR COST OF WHICH SHOULD BE BORNE BY THE MANUFACTURER, NOT THE CONSUMER.
Corrective Action:
VEHICLE IS A 2018 MERCEDES BENZ SPRINTER-BASED 24 FT MOTORHOME. IT WAS STATIONARY WITH ENGINE OFF. WHEN ROTATING THE DRIVER'S SWIVEL SEAT 180 DEGREES (WHICH IT IS DESIGNED TO DO), UNDERSEAT WIRING WAS SEVERED DUE TO IMPROPER WIRE ROUTING BY THE "UPFITTER" (DYNAMAX CORP), THUS CAUSING AN INSTRUMENT PANEL WARNING OF "SRS FAULT; PROCEED IMMEDIATELY TO REPAIR FACILITY". THIS ANALYSIS WAS MADE BY MERCEDES BENZ OF KANSAS CITY SERVICE DEPARTMENT WHERE A REPAIR WAS PERFORMED. MERCEDES BENZ REFUSED COVERAGE UNDER THE CHASSIS WARRANTY SO I PAID THE REPAIR COST OUT OF POCKET ($388.90). I SUBSEQUENTLY WROTE A LETTER TO DYNAMAX REQUESTING REIMBURSEMENT. SEE ATTACHED PDF INCLUDING MB SERVICE INVOICE AND PAYMENT RECEIPT. I RECEIVED NO RESPONSE FROM DYNAMAX FOR TWO MONTHS. UPON FOLLOWING UP WITH DYNAMAX BY PHONE ON 7/8/2019, I WAS TOLD THE REIMBURSEMENT REQUEST WAS DENIED BECAUSE I WAS NOT THE ORIGINAL PURCHASER OF THE VEHICLE AND THEREFORE NOT COVERED UNDER THEIR WARRANTY. REGARDLESS OF THEIR WARRANTY POLICY, I BELIEVE AN INOPERATIVE AIRBAG SYSTEM CAUSED BY A MANUFACTURING DEFECT CONSTITUTES A SERIOUS SAFETY HAZARD, THE REPAIR COST OF WHICH SHOULD BE BORNE BY THE MANUFACTURER, NOT THE CONSUMER.
Additional Notes:
VEHICLE IS A 2018 MERCEDES BENZ SPRINTER-BASED 24 FT MOTORHOME. IT WAS STATIONARY WITH ENGINE OFF. WHEN ROTATING THE DRIVER'S SWIVEL SEAT 180 DEGREES (WHICH IT IS DESIGNED TO DO), UNDERSEAT WIRING WAS SEVERED DUE TO IMPROPER WIRE ROUTING BY THE "UPFITTER" (DYNAMAX CORP), THUS CAUSING AN INSTRUMENT PANEL WARNING OF "SRS FAULT; PROCEED IMMEDIATELY TO REPAIR FACILITY". THIS ANALYSIS WAS MADE BY MERCEDES BENZ OF KANSAS CITY SERVICE DEPARTMENT WHERE A REPAIR WAS PERFORMED. MERCEDES BENZ REFUSED COVERAGE UNDER THE CHASSIS WARRANTY SO I PAID THE REPAIR COST OUT OF POCKET ($388.90). I SUBSEQUENTLY WROTE A LETTER TO DYNAMAX REQUESTING REIMBURSEMENT. SEE ATTACHED PDF INCLUDING MB SERVICE INVOICE AND PAYMENT RECEIPT. I RECEIVED NO RESPONSE FROM DYNAMAX FOR TWO MONTHS. UPON FOLLOWING UP WITH DYNAMAX BY PHONE ON 7/8/2019, I WAS TOLD THE REIMBURSEMENT REQUEST WAS DENIED BECAUSE I WAS NOT THE ORIGINAL PURCHASER OF THE VEHICLE AND THEREFORE NOT COVERED UNDER THEIR WARRANTY. REGARDLESS OF THEIR WARRANTY POLICY, I BELIEVE AN INOPERATIVE AIRBAG SYSTEM CAUSED BY A MANUFACTURING DEFECT CONSTITUTES A SERIOUS SAFETY HAZARD, THE REPAIR COST OF WHICH SHOULD BE BORNE BY THE MANUFACTURER, NOT THE CONSUMER.
Mfg Campaign: 11230260
Recall Date: Jul 8, 2019
Need Legal Help?
Featured Attorneys
Barry Edzant
Edzant Price LLC
Valencia, CA • 36 yrs
Focus: Lemon Law, Personal Injury